Keywords:
Newsletter:
|
Tuesday, 31 May 2011 15:16
Written by Chantal Molnar
|
We in America have a dirty little secret. Our society protects the business of baby formula. It has gotten to the point where those who support and teach breastfeeding have been named in several recent articles as breastfeeding bullies and nipple Nazis. We have been accused of causing new mothers guilt for not choosing to breastfeed, and for judging mothers who choose to formula feed their infants.
READ MORE
|
|
Wednesday, 08 June 2011 11:17
Written by Chantal Molnar
|
Recently I taught a breastfeeding class at a university medical center. One of the participants was pregnant with twins. For some reason, obstetricians are very afraid to let labor and birth happen to multiples. So, she said that her doctor had set her c-section date at 38 weeks. I asked her why 38 weeks and she responded that her doc was doing the c/s to prevent overcrowding of her uterus. Overcrowding of the uterus. That's a new diagnosis for me. I hadn't heard that one before. I guess our bodies are just not made to handle a full term pregnancy with twins. Aside from the ridiculous and fake diagnosis that requires surgery, the doctor in question is creating problems that, if she went into natural full-term twin labor, would likely be avoided.
Read more...
|
|
||||||||

I and every other breastfeeding advocate recognize the value of a readily available, affordable and accessible substitute for a mother's own milk when necessary or desired by the mother. My concern is quality and long-term effects on both the mother and her infant(s). Commercially produced baby formulas have never been subjected to independent, randomized, double-blind, controlled studies to establish their safety as a food for babies. Because the companies say they are safe, and our government has deemed them safe, we have all bought into their assumed safe use in infants. This has resulted in a century-long experiment on babies and mothers. Without the benefit of informed consent.